Candidate Statements

Because it’s unlikely you will read all 79 pages of the latest “California Statewide Direct Primary Election: Tuesday, June 8, 2010, Official Voter Information Guide,” I thought I would share a few choice selections from the Candidate Statements section. 

I tried to leave out statements, the humor of which, could be attributed to a printing error.  Also, I left out beliefs that are silly simply because they are counter to my own.  (e.g. “Free health care for everyone!”  Trust me when I say, I’m laughing with you.)

This choice entry comes from Republican candidate for Governor, Douglas R. Hughes:

As your Governor, I will ensure all pedophiles will leave the State or volunteer to live confined to Santa Rosa Island, at no cost to Californians, as they will have their own self-supporting village, away from children.

How about this poignant comparison from Republican candidate for Secretary of State, Damon Dunn:

People have to show identification to rent a movie; voters should be required to identify themselves when they vote.

Did someone give their life so I could rent new releases? 

There is no doubt how Green candidate for Secretary of State, Ann Menasche plans to power her campaign:

People power, not corporate power!

This is a bold statement from Democratic candidate for Lieutenant Governor, Eric Korevaar:

As a successful small business owner wearing many hats, I can fulfill  the Lieutenant Governor’s limited responsibilities myself without the budgeted staff of 30, thereby saving California taxpayers $10 million over 4 years.

Well I know 30 people who won’t be voting for him.

How about Democratic candidate for Attorney General, Pedro Nava:

Pedro Nava has also worked to protect Californians from natural disasters and terrorist attacks….  He will protect our communities from violent criminals, toxic polluters, and banks and insurance companies that violate the public trust.

 Is he running for Attorney General, or Captain Planet?

Democratic candidate for Insurance Commissioner, Hector De La Torre:

I am a proven fighter–even after my colleague was shot in the head, I led the recall of corrupt officials in my Southern California hometown and helped put their leader behind bars.

Note to self–stay away from corrupt officials in his hometown.   

Peace and Freedom Party Candidate for Governor, Carlos Alvarez:

Bailout working people–not banks. Fund human needs–not war!

Saving money by using his protest signs as his political platform.  Clever.

Posted in Links | Comments closed

Doing the Math

Finals are around the corner, and  I am running out of time to study.  I decided I needed to schedule how much time I was going to spend studying each subject.  The following is my breakdown:

 I have two exams and one paper due in the next three weeks.  We’ll just call them classes “A,” “B,” and “C.”

 Class A is a 2 unit course.

Class B is a 2 unit course.

Class C is a 3 unit course.

Class A and B are each worth 28.571428571428571428571428571429% of my semester GPA.  Class C is worth 42.857142857142857142857142857143%.

Because I lack the ability to do even the simplest math, I am going to round these numbers.  A and B = 29% and C = 42 %

A’s exam is in 15 days, B’s paper is due in 19 days, and C’s exam is in 20 days.  A’s and C’s exams are worth 100% of my grade in those classes.  B’s paper is worth 40% of my grade in that class. 

Then I went through my schedule for the next three weeks and picked some completely unrealistic number of hours for which I would study each day.  I came up with 255 hrs. 

Based purely on the units for each class I should dedicate, 73.95 hrs on studying on both A and B.  While, C should get 107.1 hours of studying. 

Because A’s exam is in 15 days I will need to do 73.97 hours of studying for that exam in the next 15 days.  Whereas, B and C can be spread out over the next 19 and 20 days.  In the first 15 days I have 42% dedicated to reach my goal for A, and then spread the rest of the time to B and C.  Because B is only worth 40% of my overall grade, I’ve given it a much lower percentage.   

I then adjusted the beginning percentages a tad based on how difficult I thought the material was.  What I ended up with was: A = 87 hrs, B = 39.9 hrs, and C = 128.1 hrs.  What does this tell me?

That I am a very good procrastinator.

Time to Study

Posted in Links | Comments closed

Motivation

Working hard on my motion in limine.

Where has it all gone?  Why am I have so much trouble finding it?  You would think having exams in two weeks would be motivation enough. No such luck.

I’ve stopped blogging, doing homework, and working on my statutory dictionary.  Bah.

Posted in Links | Comments closed

It’s Been How Long?

Wow.  Has it really been that long since my last post?  Pathetic.  Blog readers expect substance, and consistency.  I’ve managed to deliver neither.  Believe me, my view count reflects my flaccid blogging. 

Excuses?

I have none. 

Apology?

I’ll do my best.

Posted in Links | Comments closed

Code Junkie: Boysenberries

Jammin!

Anyone who loves boysenberries knows the magic berries originate from California.  Why then, is this deliciously jammable compound fruit not in the code?

Well it is in the code.  Just not the California code.

Read More »

Posted in Random Research, Statutory Sport, Talking to Myself | Comments closed
  • Categories

  • Meta